| English | 中文 |
Original links:
Some public company materials focus more on release controls, with branching models merely acting as supporting information.
This illustrates a real problem: for many teams, the true risk is not “how many branches to use,” but “how to safely release code after it is merged.”
The value of continuous delivery platforms like Spinnaker lies in breaking the release process into an observable, approvable, and rollback-capable pipeline.
Git is responsible for recording the facts of changes:
The release platform is responsible for controlling the delivery process:
The two must be traceable to each other. Production versions should be able to link back to Git commits, tags, PRs, and release tickets.
If a team already has relatively mature PRs and CI, the next step shouldn’t just be adding more branch rules, but adding release governance:
Suitable for:
Not suitable for:
Git workflow articles cannot just stop before the merge.
A complete enterprise collaboration pipeline should cover:
branch -> PR -> CI -> merge -> tag -> release -> deploy -> verify -> rollback